Zolved TechNews

Google turns over goverment information to the public.

Google partners with four US states to improve access to government websites (and thus, information and services).

It is a common misnomer that "everything is available on the web."  You'll also hear people say that the answer to any question is just a Google search away. Neither of these ideas are true, but hopefully over time they'll become more and more the reality. Today came news that we're one baby step closer to that reality.

Google Inc. announced today their partnerships with Arizona, California, Utah and Virginia to make it easier to search for hard-to-find public information on state government websites.  Much of what exists on government websites has not been opened up to the Google index (thus, not findable in a Google search). Also, the search engines on these sites are of questionable ability, so searching for information at .gov sites can be as frustrating as going to a government office. Well, maybe not as frustrating as a DMV visit, but still far from user-friendly.

Tim Kaine, Governor of Virginia said “Our goal is to provide easy, quick and intuitive citizen access to every government resource. Google is helping us to achieve it.” Hopefully, every state is striving towards the same goal. What would help this along?  If Yahoo! and MSN roll out their search technology and partner with other states to increase accessibility. Then we can get some good old-fashioned competition in the field of making government services more transparent. 
copyright © 2007, IPTouch, Inc.

 

 

Comments
  • Posted by: Newsie at 09 May 07:03 permalink
    Hey Diggers. Thanks for crashing our server (or whatever). I know that's big stuff. I read the Digg comments and wanted to respond to them here:

    - I corrected the here/hear typo within 45 minutes of publishing, but on Digg the original version remains. One digger said "you should use spell checker" or the like. I use Firefox 2.0 brother and its built-in spell checker, plus this typo wouldn't have been picked up by any spell checker (bonehead!).

    - The title wasn't meant to be misleading. More like an attempt at dry wit or a play on words (more like reading The Onion too much). My summary ("Google partners with four US states...") didn't show up on Digg, so I guess I could see where the complaints come from, but for the record: An attempt at humor, not to misinform.

    - I definitely used the word "misnomer" incorrectly. I should have used "misconception" but I like how "misnomer" sounds so I'm leaving that error in place.

    Rock on.